Philosophy, sounds lofty and grand, right? Those who "inevitably talk about philosophy" mostly become "philosophers". At least they feel that way themselves.
People like me, with simple minds and a bit of modesty, never dare to talk about "philosophy" rashly.
I did learn a little in the first year of college, which was a basic course. My philosophy teacher's surname is Sha, a lady, fair and clean with a sense of tranquility, and refined and elegant. I like her.
When students appreciate the teacher and the teacher fancies the students, needless to say, this course is definitely learned very well. But why can't I remember any theories later?
One day, I suddenly discovered that this guy called "philosophy" has actually "quietly and silently" infiltrated into my own blood long ago. It is so successfully lurking that it makes me "completely unaware".
One day at home, through the glass window, I used the light spot on the window to take a picture of a tree with big eyes. On the second and third days, at the same place, the same time, and the same light, I went to take pictures again, but I couldn't take a similar picture no matter what. Obviously, this is the perfect interpretation of "necessity and contingency": contingency exists in necessity; necessity also has contingency. It's your luck if you can take it; if you can't, it's also very normal... I should cherish every contingency.
In the supermarket promotion counter, all kinds of small rice cakes are very attractive. I asked, "Is it sweet?" The salesperson replied decisively, "No sweet!" "Not sweet? Well, I won't buy it!" I turned and left. The salesperson got anxious and shouted in a high-pitched voice, "Sweet! Sweet! Sweet!" So, buy, buy, buy... When I walked far away, the salesperson was still in a daze. Yes, finally someone who isn't afraid of diabetes came - isn't this "unity of opposites"?
One day when I was traveling, I sat in the passenger seat with a wide view and took pictures along the way. The driver is a young man who looks quiet but is actually fierce in nature. He once had the roughness of "obviously going to Kaifeng, but stepping on the accelerator to Lankao"; and there was also the recklessness of almost having a "close contact" with the railing. So I kept telling him all the way, "Slow down, slow down, slow down!" The young man said, "Don't worry, don't worry, the car is strong enough!" I emphasized, "The car is strong, but I'm not strong!" - Can this be classified as "relativity"?
In the community pool in spring, the pool is full of fallen flowers. I used a horizontal composition to take a picture facing the north, filling the picture with fallen flowers, feeling miserable and sorrowful, evoking everyone's feeling like "Daiyu burying flowers". Later, I took another picture at the same place for everyone to see. This time facing the south, using a vertical composition, I included the scenery beside the pool, and the "miserable and sorrowful" in the pool is not so strong. So, "Lin Daiyu" instantly becomes "Wang Xifeng". By comparing the pictures, let everyone see what the result will be when the truth becomes exaggerated. The conclusion comes: The same truth, different perspectives, will lead to different conclusions - does it mean "seeing the essence through the phenomena"?
Three apprentices passed by in front of the flowers. Apprentice A saw the flowers. Kept praising the beauty of the flowers, but didn't take a picture; apprentice B didn't notice the flowers, and of course didn't take a picture; the master saw the flowers and immediately started to take a picture... This is the gap. So, the master is still the master, and the apprentice is still the apprentice. Is there a little bit of "the law of quantitative change to qualitative change" in it?
A magpie is strutting andswaggering... During the period of staying at home, in the community yard, there are fewer people and more birds. Woodpeckers and the like, which were rarely seen in residential areas in the past, have also appeared. The bold ones even dare to show off for a few seconds in front of people. In the past, they would hide as soon as they saw a shadow. Is this a bad thing or a good thing? Is it considered "looking at problems dialectically"?
The sunlight stretches the shadow of the street lamp very big and long. Now it's noon. If it's early morning or evening, the shadow will be more exaggerated. Actually, the sun is still the same sun, and the street lamp is still the same street lamp... Suddenly I found that I have "philosophized" again.
Brother Song Jie from Nantong's "Jianghai Evening News" has a "Winter Solstice Reflection" that impressed me deeply: "The shortest day of the year, the longest memory of a lifetime. The longest night leaves the cutest sleeping position; the coldest dawn leaves the warmest topic."
Long and short, cold and warm, contradict each other and depend on each other. You don't look down on me, and I don't laugh at you.
And what someone else said: "A long road, walk slowly; deep words, say shallowly."
Are these considered "using the viewpoints of connection, development, comprehensiveness, and contradiction to inspect all worldviews and methodologies?"...
It's really philosophically "in a mess"!